Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 13202

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : September | Volume : 17 | Issue : 9 | Page : SC10 - SC14 Full Version

Frequency and Patterns of Bacteraemia in Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: September 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66152.18460
Syed Athhar Saqqaf, Shantanu Vijay Gomase, Rajendra Borkar, Amar Taksande, Rupesh Rao, Sachin Yedve

1. Consultant, Department of Paediatrics, RK Hospital for Women and Children, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 6. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shantanu Vijay Gomase,
M4-10, Meghdoot Apartment, Paloti Road, Sawangi (M), Wardha-442004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drgomase@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is one of the most common inherited haemoglobinopathies and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in early childhood among the affected population. Infection is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in SCD.

Aim: To investigate the frequency and pattern of bacteraemia in children with SCD.

Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Paediatricss at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Hospital, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, a tertiary care hospital attached to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College from October 2019 to September 2021. A total of 70 patients with SCD, aged upto 18 years, who presented with fever on two separate occasions and were admitted to the hospital, were included in the study. Blood culture, complete blood counts, and C-reactive Protein (CRP) tests were conducted to detect bacteraemia immediately after admission and when required. Quantitative data was analysed using mean, median, and standard deviation.

Results: In the present study, out of 70 patients, 40 (57.14%) were male and 30 (42.86%) were female. A total of 54 (77.14%) were homozygous and 16 (22.86%) were heterozygous for SCD. A total of 30 (42.86%) patients belonged to the 6-10 years age group. Fever and pallor were the most common clinical findings. The rate of bacteraemia was found to be 15.71%. Gram-negative organisms were more frequently isolated compared to gram-positive isolates. The most common organism isolated in sickle cell patients was Klebsiella species (36.36%).

Conclusion: Bacteraemia was observed in only approximately 15.71% of the patients. Gram-negative bacteraemia was more prevalent in patients with SCD. Patients with acute chest syndrome were more susceptible to bacterial infections. Mortality was higher in sickle cell patients from whom organisms were isolated in blood cultures.

Keywords

Blood culture, Crisis, Fever, Gram-negative bacteraemia, Haemoglobinopathies

Haemoglobinopathy is the most common monogenic disorder in India. Of these haemoglobinopathy, α thalassaemia is seen in all communities, but SCD is more prevalent in the malaria endemic zone (1). It is more commonly seen among people of Africa, Southeast Asia, and Middle East countries (2). SCD is an important contributor to under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (3). The prevalence of sickle haemoglobin varies between 0-40% in India. The affected regions include Central India, Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, Kerala, Orissa, south Madhya Pradesh, and Eastern Gujarat (4). Sickle cell anaemia can be life-threatening due to its acute or chronic complications such as vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome, sequestration crisis, stroke, pulmonary hypertension, and infection (5). The crises are often preceded by stressful events such as fever, infection, hypoxia, emotional upheaval, and dehydration (6). However, in most patients, no obvious factor precedes the crisis (7).

Bacterial infections are one of the most prevalent complications faced by patients with SCD and can present as both acute or chronic conditions. They contribute to the morbidity and mortality rate, affecting both younger and older age groups (5). Sickle cell anaemia patients are at risk of infection due to functional asplenia or hyposplenia, mechanical factors, and complement system dysfunction (5). The most common presentation of bacterial infection remains fever. Additionally, fever induced by bacteraemia in children with SCD is often misdiagnosed as a vaso-occlusive crisis (8). The detection of the causative organism remains a major challenge, as some of the previously detected causative organisms are fastidious and slow-growing (9).

Therefore, the present study was conducted to explore the frequency and patterns of bacteraemia in children with SCD and to study the causative organism and its outcome. This will help us understand the primary causes of infections in Indian population, and additional measures can be taken to overcome this morbidity and mortality.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Paediatricss at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Hospital, a tertiary care hospital attached to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from October 2019 to September 2021. The study was conducted after obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC number: DMIMS/DU/IEC/2021/562). Informed written consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of the patients who were willing to participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria: All patients under 18 years of age who had previously been diagnosed with SCD and were currently admitted to the Paediatrics ward with a fever higher than 100°F on two separate occasions during this admission, as well as febrile patients newly diagnosed with SCD during the admission, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were admitted for prophylactic blood transfusion, SCD patients presenting with conditions other than fever, and patients attending only the outpatient department were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

All essential data, including demographic information such as age, sex, and residence, were recorded. Sickling pattern was confirmed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), and detailed history about symptoms during presentation and socioeconomic status was noted. Physical examinations, such as assessment of pallor, icterus, temperature, peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and joint examination, were performed and recorded in a pre-designed proforma. The Modified BG Prasad socioeconomic scale was used to determine socioeconomic status (10). A 5 mL blood sample was collected by venipuncture under aseptic precautions upon admission before starting antibiotics. The collected blood was transferred to a BACTEC bottle for Paediatrics use. The needle was changed before puncturing the bottle. The sample was processed in the hospital’s microbiology laboratory using the automated BD BACTEC blood culture system within one hour of collection. Investigations for detecting bacteraemia, such as blood culture, complete blood counts, and CRP, were performed immediately after admission and repeated as needed.

Definitions used:

• Bacteraemia: Fever with isolation of bacteria from the blood (11).
• Vaso-occlusive crisis: “The new onset of pain that lasts at least four hours for which there is no explanation other than vasoocclusion and requires therapy with parenteral opioids or ketorolac in a medical facility (7).”
• Acute chest syndrome: “A severe form of sickle cell crisis manifesting as a new pulmonary infiltrate involving at least one complete lung segment consistent with alveolar consolidation accompanied by chest pain, fever (>38.5°C), tachypnoea, and wheezing or coughing (7).”
• Haemolytic crisis: Sudden drop in haemoglobin, jaundice (7).
• Mixed crisis: Overlap of two or more of the above crises (12).
• Tachypnoea: “The definition of tachypnoea is related to age, with a respiratory rate of >60 breaths/min in infants aged 0-2 months, >50 in infants 2-12 months, >40 in children 1-5 years, and >20 in children >5 years of age” (13).

Statistical Analysis

All data were entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using Stata software (Stata 10, Stata Corporation, Texas, USA). Quantitative data were analysed using measures such as mean, median, and standard deviation. Data were analysed based on the assigned groups. Normally distributed continuous data were compared using the Student’s t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for skewed data. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for analysing qualitative data. Differences between means were compared using unpaired Student’s t-test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the present study, a total of 70 Paediatrics admissions were included, of which 54 belonged to homozygous sickle disease and 16 were of heterozygous sickle disease. There were 40 (57.14%) males and 30 (42.86%) females affected by the sickle cell disorder, with a male:female ratio of 1.3:1. Among the patients, 14 (20%) were in the 0-5 years age group, while 26 (37.14%) and 30 (42.86%) belonged to the 6-10 years and >10 years age groups, respectively. Only 20 (28.57%) of the patients received hydroxyurea, and none of the sickle cell trait patients received hydroxyurea (Table/Fig 1). The majority of patients presented with isolated fever or fever with symptoms other than crisis (e.g., burning micturition, rash, running nose, sore throat, etc.), followed by fever with joint pain, fever with breathlessness, fever with jaundice, fever with joint pain and breathlessness, fever with breathlessness and jaundice, and fever with joint pain and jaundice (Table/Fig 2).

Among the studied population, 20 (28.57%) patients had a history of consanguinity. Clinical examination revealed pallor in 49 (70%) patients, icterus in 24 (34.28%) patients, splenomegaly in 28 (40%) patients, and malnutrition in 21 (30%) patients. Blood culture was positive in 11 (15.71%) patients. When various parameters such as history of consanguinity, pallor, icterus, splenomegaly, malnutrition, and bacteraemia were compared between the homozygous and heterozygous groups, they were all statistically significant, except for malnutrition and bacteraemia (Table/Fig 3).

Bacteraemia was observed in 11 admissions, and when compared with the culture-negative group, CRP levels were significantly higher in the culture-positive group. The mean duration of stay was 7.81±10.35 days in the culture-negative patients and 10.09±9 days in the culture-positive patients. Among both groups, haemoglobin, TLC, neutrophils, platelet count, and hospital stay were statistically insignificant (Table/Fig 4). Among the 11 participants with culture growth, 7 (63.63%) had growth of gram-negative organisms, while gram-positive organisms were observed in 4 (36.36%) patients. Among them, 4 (36.36%) patients had Klebsiella species growth. Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus species were observed in 3 (27.27%) patients each, and Streptococcus species growth was observed in 1 (9.09%) patient (Table/Fig 5).

Out of the total 11 participants with organism growth in their cultures, only 2 (18.18%) had not received prior antibiotics, while the other 9 (81.82%) had received prior antibiotics. Among the 70 admissions, 31 presented without any crisis, 31 (44.28%) presented with one of the crises, and 8 (11.42%) presented with an overlap/mixed of various crises (Table/Fig 6). When the association of crisis was examined with the culture-positive group, no significant association was found between these two parameters (Table/Fig 7).

Out of the 54 homozygous patients, only 20 were receiving hydroxyurea. The association of hydroxyurea with episodes of sickle cell crisis was not found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 8).

A total of 4 (36.36%) of the patients with growth in their cultures did not develop any crisis, while 5 (36.36%) of them developed acute chest syndrome alone. Additionally, 2 (18.18%) had vaso-occlusive crisis with super-added haemolytic crisis. One (9.09%) patient with growth in their culture had an isolated vaso-occlusive crisis. All deaths observed occurred only in patients in whom the culture was reported to be positive. Out of the total 11 patients with growth of organisms seen, 2 (18.18%) succumbed to death, while the other 9 (81.81%) were discharged from the hospital after successful management. This difference observed was statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.001.

Discussion

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disease that occurs due to the substitution of valine for glutamic acid at the 6th position of the beta-globin gene. Patients with homozygous HbS gene are diagnosed with SCD, while those with heterozygous HbS gene are referred to as having sickle cell trait (14). SCD can manifest as homozygous (SS), heterozygous (AS), or other heterozygous forms, such as sickle thalassaemia. Sickle cell anaemia (SS) is more symptomatic than sickle cell trait (AS) and presents with various manifestations such as dactylitis, swelling, and pain in large joints, body ache, abdominal pain, headache, neurodeficit in the form of motor weakness, anaemia, jaundice, etc. Patients may exhibit signs of anaemia, icterus, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or both, along with features of crises such as vaso-occlusive crisis, aplastic crisis, sequestration crisis, and haemolytic crisis. The SCD can present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Fever without a source in a sickle cell patient is considered a medical emergency as it increases the possibility of bacterial infection, which can subsequently lead to a high mortality rate. Every febrile sickle cell child needs to undergo thorough investigation for bacterial infection.

In the present study, there were 54 admissions with homozygous sickle disease and 16 with heterozygous sickle disease. Among them, a total of 40 (57.14%) males and 30 (42.85%) females were affected by the sickle cell disorder, resulting in a male:female ratio of 1.3:1. The male:female ratio in SCD was 1.7:1, while in the trait group, it was 0.6:1. Similar findings were observed in a study conducted by Alima Yanda AN et al., where males (58, 60.4%) were more affected than females (38, 39.4%) (5). Mandot S and Ameta G found a male:female ratio of 3.6:1 in SCD patients and 1.38:1 in those with sickle cell trait, which did not match with the present study (15). This difference can be attributed to the fact that their study aimed to document the prevalence of sickle cell anaemia only among the scheduled tribe (Garasia) of Sirohi district in Rajasthan state, which has an unequal gender distribution. Among the total study population of 70 individuals, 14 (20%) belonged to the 0-5 years age group, while 26 (37.14%) and 30 (42.86%) belonged to the 6-10 years and >10 years age groups, respectively. Thus, the majority of children in the study belonged to the >10 years age group. This finding is consistent with a study conducted by Vieira AK et al., (16). Yadav R et al., stated that the majority of children (30.2%) belonged to the 5-10 year age group, compared to 21% in the 10-15 year age group and 19.3% in the below five years age group (17). The presenting age in the present study is higher compared to other studies, as the index cases are from a hospital that serves a rural geographic area where awareness, literacy rates, and the tendency to seek medical advice from a health facility are lacking. The other studies mentioned were conducted in urban areas (12),(18),(19).

The present study findings revealed consanguinity in 19 (35.19%) of the homozygous group and only 1 (6.25%) participant in the heterozygous group. This data was statistically significant, and similar conclusions can be drawn from various other studies (12),(18),(19). The majority of the index patients belonged to Scheduled Caste (SC) or Scheduled Tribes (ST). Similar findings were noted in a study from Gondia district in Maharashtra (20). The majority of the present study population was from rural areas with low socioeconomic status. It is difficult to infer whether socioeconomic status plays a role in the clinical outcome of the disease from the present study due to the small sample size. However, it is proven that lower socioeconomic status increases the prevalence of SCD, the risk of complications, the number of hospital admissions, and lowers health-related quality of life (21).

Almost 30% of the study population received intravenous or oral antibiotics before being investigated for bacteraemia. This use of antibiotics may reduce the rate of culture positivity. Hydroxyurea was prescribed only to homozygous patients, and only 37% of homozygous patients received it. The association between hydroxyurea and the frequency of sickle cell crisis was found to be statistically insignificant. This is contradictory to other studies that have shown that hydroxyurea reduces the episodes of painful crisis and the need for blood transfusions (22),(23). This discrepancy could be due to lower compliance, as hydroxyurea is a costly drug and the majority of our study population comes from rural areas with low socioeconomic status. Splenomegaly was observed in 25 (89.29%) of the homozygous and 3 (10.71%) of the heterozygous study participants out of the total of 28 children. The differences observed in the data for pallor, icterus, and splenomegaly were statistically significant. The present study revealed pallor in 70%, icterus in 24 (34.28%), and splenomegaly in 28 (40%) of the participants. The results for pallor and splenomegaly were comparable to a study conducted by Mandot S and Ameta G but present study showed icterus in only 3.25% of patients (15). This variation can be attributed to differences in the study population. In the present study, 77% of the population was homozygous, and icterus is a more predominant feature of the homozygous variety of sickle cell disease.

Fever and infection can be precipitating factors for various crises, but a significant association was not found in the present study. Vaso-occlusive crisis was present in 15 (21.42%) participants, acute chest syndrome in 9 (12.85%), and haemolytic crisis in 7 (10%), with 8 (11.42%) experiencing a mixed crisis. These findings are consistent with studies by Kamble M and Chatruvedi P and Wierenga KJ et al., (12),(24). Wierenga KJ et al., observed that painful crisis occurred in 45 (27.3%) of the events, with 20 being isolated findings and the other 25 being associated with other conditions such as acute chest syndrome (24).

The present study’s results showed that bacteraemia was seen in only 11 patients who had a fever. Similar studies have shown bacteraemia rates ranging from 9% to 20.8% (19),(25),(26). In contrast, a study by AI Salman J et al., from Bahrain showed bacteraemia in 46.67% of patients (27). These variations in blood culture positivity could be due to various factors, such as differences in methods of blood culture specimen collection and the use of prior antibiotics. Gram-negative bacteraemia was predominant in the present study, which is consistent with findings from various other similar studies (24),(25),(28). The organisms grown in blood cultures were variable, with commonly isolated gram-negative bacteria including Klebsiella and Pseudomonas species, while gram-positive cultures often included Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species. The most common isolated species in blood cultures varies in various studies. In the present study, Klebsiella species were the most common, accounting for 36.36% of isolates. Similar findings were noted in other studies, ranging from 26% to 59% (29),(30). However, other studies have reported Staphylococcus aureus (25) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24) as the most common isolates. Wierenga KJ et al., noted that out of 10 isolates, 3 (30%) were Streptococcus pneumoniae, H. influenzae constituted 20%, and the remaining 50% were gram-negative bacteria (24). Lalhmunsangi J et al., reported Staphylococcus aureus (20.23%), E. coli (19%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.47%), and Pseudomonas (9.52%) as the most common isolates (25). Brown B et al., observed Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%) and Staphylococcus aureus (25%) (26).

In the present study, 4 (36.36%) patients with growth in their cultures did not develop any crisis, while 4 (36.36%) developed acute chest syndrome alone, 2 (18.18%) had vaso-occlusive crisis with super-added haemolytic crisis, and 1 (9.09%) patient with growth in their culture had an isolated vaso-occlusive crisis. These findings were statistically significant. Vichinsky EP et al., observed that the most frequent complications during vaso-occlusive crisis episodes were infectious diseases (25.9%), fever (21.8%), and pulmonary disorders (16.2%) (31).

The present study findings revealed that both deaths observed were in patients where the culture was reported to be positive. Among the total of 11 patients with growth of organisms in their cultures, 2 (18.18%) died, while the other 9 (81.81%) were discharged from the hospital after successful management. This difference was statistically significant. Akuse RM stated that 12 (80%) of the 15 patients who died had infection (28).

Limitation(s)

The present study specifically evaluates bacteraemia as a cause of febrile episodes in SCD. Other bacterial infections, viral illnesses, and parasitic infections were not studied. It is important to note that many of the study participants received antibiotics prior to admission in the hospital or in the outpatient department, which could have affected the detection of the organisms in the culture media.

Conclusion

In the present study, prevalence of bacteraemia in children with SCD admitted to our rural hospital was found to be 15.71%. Gram-negative organisms were found to be responsible for the majority of the infections, with Klebsiella species being the most commonly isolated organism, followed by Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, and occasionally Streptococcus species. Among the patients with positive blood cultures, fever and pallor were the most common clinical findings on admission. Bacteraemia was predominantly seen in sickle cell children who presented with acute chest syndrome at the time of admission. Deaths were observed only in those patients where blood culture reports were found to be positive.

References

1.
Gorakshakar AC. Epidemiology of sickle hemoglobin in India. Proceedings of National Symposium on Tribal Health, 103-108. Available from: https://www.nirth.res.in/publications/nsth/14.AC.Gorakshakar.pdf.
2.
Thomson AM, McHugh TA, Oron AP, Teply C, Lonberg N, Vilchis Tella V, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000–2021: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Haematology. 2023;10(8):585-599. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Wastnedge E, Waters D, Patel S, Morrison K, Goh MY, Adeloye D, et al. The global burden of sickle cell disease in children under five years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):021103. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Colah RB, Mukherjee MB, Martin S, Ghosh K. Sickle cell disease in tribal populations in India. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(5):509-15.
5.
Alima Yanda AN, Nansseu JRN, Mbassi Awa HD, Tatah SA, Seungue J, Eposse C, et al. Burden and spectrum of bacterial infections among sickle cell disease children living in Cameroon. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017;17(1):211. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Manaster BJ, editor. Sickle Cell Anaemia. In: Diagnostic Imaging: Musculoskeletal Non-Traumatic Disease (Second Edition) [Internet]. Elsevier; 2016 [cited 2023 May 21]. pp. 824-29. (Diagnostic Imaging). Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323392525502213. [crossref]
7.
Ballas SK. Chapter 26-Sickle Cell Pain. In: Waldman SD, editor. Pain Management (Second Edition) [Internet]. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2011 [cited 2023 May 21]. p. 243-48. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978143770721200026X. [crossref]
8.
Jeyakumar D, Zibelman M, Hurth R, Krauz L, Saraf S, Molokie R, et al. Fever in hospitalized adult patients with sickle cell disease. Blood. 2010;116(21):2652. [crossref]
9.
Bello N, Kudu ATD, Adetokun AB, Taura DW, Jobbi YD, Umar M, et al. Characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of bacteraemia causing pathogens isolated from febrile children with and without sickle cell disease in Kano, Nigeria. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2018;10(1):e2018016. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Bashar MdA. Modified BG Prasad socioeconomic status scale: Updated for the year 2022. Indian Pediatr. 2022;59(10):816-16. [crossref]
11.
Smith DA, Nehring SM. Bacteremia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 14]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441979/.
12.
Kamble M, Chatruvedi P. Epidemiology of sickle cell disease in a rural hospital of central India. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37(4):391-96.
13.
McGann KA, Long SS. 21- Respiratory Tract Symptom Complexes. In: Long SS, editor. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases (Sixth Edition) [Internet]. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 2]. pp. 169-77.e2. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323756082000215.[crossref]
14.
Tulika S. Hematological Disorders: Hemolytic anaemias. 9 th Edition. New Delhi: CBS Publishers & Distributors; 2019. pp. 342-43.
15.
Mandot S, Ameta G. Prevalence, clinical, and hematological profile of sickle cell disease in south Rajasthan. IJCH. 2016;03(03):248-50. [crossref]
16.
Vieira AK, Alvim CG, Carneiro MCM, Ibiapina C da C. Pulmonary function in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: Have we paid proper attention to this problem. J Bras Pneumol. 2016;42(6):409-15. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Yadav R, Lazarus M, Ghanghoria P, Singh M, Gupta RB, Kumar S, et al. Sickle cell disease in Madhya Pradesh, Central India: A comparison of clinical profile of sickle cell homozygote vs. sickle-beta thalassaemia individuals. Hematology. 2016;21(9):558-63. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Zaini RG. Sickle-cell anaemia and consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. Archives of Medicine. 2016;8(3):01-03.
19.
Elobied SS, Ramadan IA, Abdelmotaleb GS, Younis A. Study of common infections among children with sickle cell anaemia in Saudi Arabia. 2021;38(1):65-78.
20.
Kamble PJ, Tripathi SK. Demographic and geographic distribution of sickle cell diseasein gondia district of central India: A hospital based study. Persp Med Res [Internet]. 2020 May 5 [cited 2023 May 31];8(1):59-63. Available from: https:// pimr.org.in/2020-vol8-issue-1/originalarticle10_v1.pdf. [crossref]
21.
Ozdemir D, Kulbay M, Erdinc B, Avezbakiyev B. Clinical impact and outcomes of socioeconomic status on patients with sickle cell disease: A pilot study and literature review. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):13070. [crossref]
22.
Charache S, Terrin ML, Moore RD, Dover GJ, Barton FB, Eckert SV, et al. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anaemia. Investigators of the multicenter study of hydroxyurea in sickle cell anaemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(20):1317-22. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Chianumba RI, Ofakunrin AOD, Morrice J, Olanrewaju O, Oniyangi O, Kuliya-Gwarzo A, et al. Outcome of hydroxyurea use in scd and evaluation of patients’ perception and experience in Nigeria. Frontiers in Genetics [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Aug 2];13. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.826132. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Wierenga KJ, Hambleton IR, Wilson RM, Alexander H, Serjeant BE, Serjeant GR. Significance of fever in Jamaican patients with homozygous sickle cell disease. Arch Dis Child. 2001;84(2):156-59. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Lalhmunsangi J, Bhise SM, Katkar V, Surpam R, Roy S. Pattern of bacterial infections among children with sickle cell disease in a tertiary care hospital of Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. JCDR [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 May 24]; Available from: https://www.jcdr.net//article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2022&m onth=August&volume=16&issue=8&page=DC64-DC69&id=16767.
26.
Brown B, Dada-Adegbola H, Trippe C, Olopade O. Prevalence and etiology of bacteremia in febrile children with sickle cell disease at a nigeria tertiary hospital. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017;9(1):e2017039. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Al Salman J, Al Agha RA, Al Taitoon S, Al Arrayed A. Fever in sickle cell disease patients in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Infect Public Health. 2014;7(4):333-38. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Akuse RM. Variation in the pattern of bacterial infection in patients with sickle cell disease requiring admission. J Trop Pediatr. 1996;42(6):318-23. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Okuonghae HO, Nwankwo MU, Offor EC. Pattern of bacteraemia in febrile children with sickle cell anaemia. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1993;13(1):55-64. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Shinde S, Bakshi AP, Shrikhande AV. Infections in sickle cell disease. IAIM. 2015;2(11):26-34.
31.
Vichinsky EP, Neumayr LD, Earles AN, Williams R, Lennette ET, Dean D, et al. Causes and outcomes of the acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. National Acute Chest Syndrome Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1855-65.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66152.18460

Date of Submission: Jun 20, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 19, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 19, 2023
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 21, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jul 25, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 15, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com